Dataset: Cowpea Cultivars with Residual Organomineral Fertilizers from Crop Corn Cultivation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46420/TAES.e240007

Keywords:

Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp., U. ruziensis, natural phosphates, superphosphate

Abstract

Cowpea is a critical dietary staple, especially in tropical and subtropical regions, due to its high protein content, essential amino acids, and other nutrients. This study aimed to assess the impact of residual organomineral fertilizers from a preceding corn crop on cowpea cultivars in southern Maranhão, Brazil. Two cowpea cultivars, BRS Tucumaque and BRS Nova Era, were evaluated using a randomized block design with three replications. This study incorporated two organomineral fertilizers derived from cattle manure and natural phosphates a simple superphosphate at a dose of 50 kg ha-1, and a control without phosphorus fertilization. The key agronomic traits measured included the number of nodes, pod per plant, grains per pod, thousand-grain weight, and yield per hectare. This research underscores the potential of organomineral fertilizers to enhance cowpea yield while minimizing environmental impact, offering a viable alternative to conventional fertilization methods. These findings advocate broader adoption of organomineral fertilizers in cowpea cultivation, potentially increasing yield and reducing costs. The database derived from this research is composed of 48 samples. Four types of fertilization were considered: control, simple superphosphate and two organomineral fertilizers; two planting systems with and without U. ruziensis straw; and two cultivars.

References

Barbieri, A.P.P.; Martin, T.N.; Mertz, L.M.; Nunes, U.R.; Conceição, G.M. (2013). Population reduction of wheat for yield and the physiological quality of seeds. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 44(4), 724-731. DOI: 10.1590/S1806-66902013000400008

Coelho, Y.P.; Zuffo, A.M.; Ratke, R.F.; Caldas, A.N.S.; Mezzomo, R.; Barrozo, L.M.; Sousa, C.H.C.; Elsayed, A. Y.A.M.; Fonseca, W.L.; Santos, A.S.; Fontes, L.O. (2023). Physiological quality of soybean seeds as a function of organic-mineral fertilizers. Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales, 16, 23632-23650. DOI: 10.55905/revconv.16n.10-292

Concenço, G.; Tomazi, M.; Correia, I.V.T.; Santos, S.A.; Galon, L. 2013. Phytosociological surveys: tools for weedscience? Planta Daninha, 31(2), 469-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582013000200025

CONAB - Companhia Nacional De Abastecimento. Acompanhamento de safra brasileira: grãos safra 2021/2022 - n. 3 – Terceiro levantamento (2022). Brasília - DF, 99.

Crusciol, C.A.C.; De Campos M.; Martelli, J.M.; Alves, C.J.; Nascimento, C.A.C.; Pereira, J.C. dos R.; Cantarella, H. (2020). Organomineral Fertilizer as Source of P and K for Sugarcane. Scientific Reports, 10, 5398. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62315-1

FAOSTAT. Crops. Available in: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Access at: 10 May 2022.

Fernandes, P.H. (2020). Use of phosphate organomineral fertilizers in the cultivation of lettuce and corn in succession. Brazilian Journal of Development, 6(6), 37907-37922. DOI: 10.34117/bjdv6n6-365

Freitas, R.M.O.; Dombroski, J.L.D.; Freitas, F.C.L.; Nogueira, N.V.; Pinto, J.R.S. (2017). Physiological responses of cowpea under water stress and rewatering in no-tillage and conventional tillage systems. Revista Caatinga, 30, 559-567. DOI: 10.1590/1983-21252017v30n303rc

MARANHÃO - GOVERNO DO ESTADO DO MARANHÃO (2002). Gerência de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento Econômico - GEPLAN. Atlas do Maranhão. São Luís: Universidade Estadual do Maranhão, 39.

McKinney, W. (2010). Data structures for statistical computing in Python. In Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, 445, (1), 51-56.

Passos, M.L.; Zambrzycki, G.C.; Pereira, R.S. (2017). Balanço hídrico climatológico e classificação climática para o município de Balsas-MA. Revista Scientia Agraria, 18(1), 83-89. DOI: 10.5380/rsa.v18i1.48584

Perina, E.F.; Carvalho, C.R.L.; Chiorato, A.F.; Lopes, R.L.T.; Gonçalves, J.G.R.; Carbonell, S.A.M. (2014). Technological quality of common bean grains obtained in different growing seasons. Bragantia, 73, 14-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/brag.2014.008

Santos, H.G. et al. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos, Embrapa, ed. 5, 2018.

Soares, M.B.B.; Bianco, S.; Finoto, E.L.; Bolonhezi, D.; Albuquerque, J.A.A. (2017). Phytosociological study on the weed communities in green sugarcane field reform using conservation tillage and oilseed crops in succession. Applied ecology and environmental research, 15(3), 417-428. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1503_417428

Vale, J.C; Bertini, C.; Borém, A. (2017). Feijão-caupi: do plantio à colheita. Viçosa, Ed. UFV, 267.

Van Rossum, G., Drake Jr, F. L. (1995). Python tutorial. Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-14

Issue

2024 Edition

Section

Scientific Database Section

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Trends in Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

You are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license.