El papel crucial del contenido de carbohidratos y proteínas en la raíz de Parkinsonia aculeata frente a salinidad y sequia en el semidesierto de Sonora, México
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46420/TAES.e240014Palavras-chave:
estrés abiótico, ecología, fisiología vegetal, mitigación, cambio climáticoResumo
El cambio climático está alterando los patrones de precipitación y temperatura, afectando a los ecosistemas y cultivos, por lo que es vital estudiar a adaptación al estrés abiótico, especialmente en zonas áridas. Parkinsonia aculeata es una especie del semi-desierto de Sonora. Evaluar su respuesta frente al estrés por salinidad y sequía; determinando el impacto de estas condiciones en el contenido de carbohidratos y proteínas totales en las raíces utilizando métodos estándar es el objetivo del presente trabajo. Al evaluar las raíces el contenido de carbohidratos fue mayor en el sitio con salinidad (3.803 mg g-1 ms) comparado con el sitio con sequía (3.696 mg g-1 ms). En contraste, el contenido de proteínas fue mayor en el sitio afectado por sequía (5.632 mg g-1 ms) en relación a la afectación por salinidad (2.132 mg g-1 ms). Estas diferencias indican que las raíces de P. aculeata responden de manera distinta a la salinidad y a la sequía, adaptándose a las condiciones abióticas específicas, por lo que potencialmente pueden ser utilizados como indicadores clave de la adaptación de la planta al estrés abiótico, proporcionando información valiosa para la ecología y conservación de ecosistemas áridos en el contexto del cambio climático.
Referências
Anten N.P., Chen B.J. (2021). Detect thy family: mechanisms, ecology and agricultural aspects of kin recognition in plants. Plant Cell Environment, 44(4): 1059–1071. DOI: 10.1111/pce.14011
Ahmad, D., Ying, Y., & Bao, J. (2024). Understanding starch biosynthesis in potatoes for metabolic engineering to improve starch quality: A detailed review. Carbohydrate Polymers, 122592. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122592
AOAC (1997). Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists: edited Ig W. Horwitz 16ª ed. Washington, v.2, 850p.
Chen, S., & Gong, B. (2021). Response and adaptation of agriculture to climate change: Evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 148, 102557. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102557
Choi, K., Khan, R., & Lee, S. W. (2021). Dissection of plant microbiota and plant-microbiome interactions. Journal of Microbiology, 59(3), 281-291. DOI: 10.1007/s12275-021-0619-5
Gosset E. (1917). Another differences calculus based on standard deviation and confidence interval. Statistical References 26:66-72
Ghosh, D., & Xu, J. (2014). Abiotic stress responses in plant roots: a proteomics perspective. Frontiers in plant science, 5, 6. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00006
Goche, T., Shargie, N. G., Cummins, I., Brown, A. P., Chivasa, S., & Ngara, R. (2020). Comparative physiological and root proteome analyses of two sorghum varieties responding to water limitation. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 11835. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68735-3
Herrera-Sepúlveda, A., Argentel-Martínez, L., Peñuelas-Rubio, O., & Azizoglu, U. (2024). First report of Sinomonas halotolerans from Parkinsonia aculeata rhizosphere. Biologia, 79(2), 621-627. DOI: 10.1007/s11756-023-01581-6
IPCC (2007). Climate change: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Contribution of Working Group II. Fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 976.
Jan, N., Qazi, H. A., Raja, V., & John, R. (2019). Proteomics: A tool to decipher cold tolerance. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology, 31, 183-213. DOI: 10.1007/s40626-019-00140-2
Ji, L., Attaullah, K., Wang, J., Yu, D., Yang, Y., Yang, L., & Lu, Z. (2020). Root traits determine variation in nonstructural carbohydrates (NSCs) under different drought intensities and soil substrates in three temperate tree species. Forests, 11(4), 415. DOI: 10.3390/f11040415
Karlova, R., Boer, D., Hayes, S., & Testerink, C. (2021). Root plasticity under abiotic stress. Plant Physiology, 187(3), 1057-1070. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab392
Khan, M. A., Gemenet, D. C., & Villordon, A. (2016). Root system architecture and abiotic stress tolerance: current knowledge in root and tuber crops. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1584. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01584
Koevoets, I.T., Venema, J.H., Elzenga J.T.M., Testerink, C. (2016). Roots withstanding their environment: exploiting root system architecture responses to abiotic stress to improve crop tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1335–1335. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01335
Kul, R., Ekinci, M., Turan, M., Ors, S., & Yildirim, E. (2020). How abiotic stress conditions affects plant roots. In Plant roots. IntechOpen. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.95286
Li, Q., Zhao, M., Wang, N., Liu, S., Wang, J., Zhang, W., ... & Du, N. (2020). Water use strategies and drought intensity define the relative contributions of hydraulic failure and carbohydrate depletion during seedling mortality. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 153, 106-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.05.023
Mei Li, M. L., Wang Zheng Quan, W. Z., Cheng Yun Huan, C. Y., & Guo DaLi, G. D. (2004). A review: factors influencing fine root longevity in forest ecosystems. Acta Phytoecologia casinica, 28(4), 704r710. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2004.0094
Peñuelas-Rubio, O., Argentel-Martínez, L., Herrera-Sepúlveda, A., Maldonado-Mendoza, I. E., González-Aguilera, J., & Azizoglu, U. (2024). Rhizobacteria associated with Parkinsonia aculeata L. under semi desertic drought and saline conditions. Biologia, 79(8), 2591-2603. DOI: 10.1007/s11756-024-01731-4
Raza A, Razzaq A, Mehmood SS, Zou X, Zhang X, Lv Y, Xu J (2019) Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: a review. Plants 8, 34. DOI: 10.3390/plants8020034
Rodwell, V. W., Bender, D., & Botham, K. M. (2018). Harper’s illustrated biochemistry. McGraw-Hill.
Surabhi, G. K. (2018). Update in root proteomics with special reference to abiotic stresses: achievements and challenges. Journal of Protein Proteomics, 9(1), 31-35.
StatSoft, Inc. (2014). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 12. Available online: www.statsoft.com
Tariq, A., Graciano, C., Sardans, J., Zeng, F., Hughes, A. C., Ahmed, Z., & Peñuelas, J. (2024). Plant root mechanisms and their effects on carbon and nutrient accumulation in desert ecosystems under changes in land use and climate. New Phytologist, 242(3), 916-934. DOI: 10.1111/nph.19676
Yi, L., Ma, J., & Li, Y. (2007). Impact of salt stress on the features and activities of root system for three desert halophyte species in their seedling stage. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 50(Suppl 1), 97-106. DOI: 10.1007/s11430-007-5012-7
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Trends in Agricultural and Environmental Sciences
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license.
